What DIAAS Measures
The Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) is the gold‑standard method recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) since 2013 for assessing the quality of dietary protein in foods intended for human consumption. It evaluates how effectively a protein source supplies indispensable (essential) amino acids after accounting for how well those amino acids are digested and absorbed in the small intestine. This makes DIAAS a more accurate reflection of true, bioavailable protein quality.
Why DIAAS Matters
- Provides a more precise measure of bioavailable amino acids, including the impact of plant anti‑nutritional factors such as phytates that reduce absorption.
- Distinguishes high‑quality proteins more clearly (e.g., whey ≈ 109 vs. soy isolate ≈ 90).
- Avoids score truncation, allowing superior proteins—often animal-based or purified plant isolates—to be fully recognized.
- Helps optimize mixed diets by identifying limiting amino acids (e.g., lysine in grains, sulfur amino acids in legumes).
Complete Proteins in Plant‑Based Diets
Key Findings from the Analysis
This analysis asked AI to rank leading plant‑based protein sources using the DIAAS framework. The findings are summarized in the chart above and the table below.
Plant‑based eaters can improve overall protein quality by combining complementary foods — for example, pairing grains with legumes to raise the effective DIAAS of a meal. The highest‑scoring plant proteins are typically processed isolates such as soy, pea, and potato, which achieve higher scores because processing removes fiber and anti‑nutrients that otherwise reduce amino‑acid digestibility. Whole grains and legumes score lower by comparison, yet they still offer valuable nutrition when eaten in variety.
|
Plant Source |
DIAAS Range (approx.) |
Typical Form |
Notes / Limiting AA |
|
Potato |
100–118 |
Concentrate or cooked whole |
Excellent; balanced profile, often the top whole-plant source |
|
Soy |
90–100 |
Isolate/concentrate |
Good/excellent;
Met+Cys sometimes limiting in whole forms |
|
Pea |
82–91 |
Concentrate/isolate |
Good; Met+Cys limiting |
|
Quinoa |
68–85 |
Cooked
whole |
Pseudocereal;
good lysine, borderline good quality |
|
Canola/Rapeseed |
70–90+ |
Concentrate |
Good in processed forms; balanced |
|
Lentils |
68–75 |
Cooked |
Borderline
good; often SAA limiting |
|
Chickpeas |
67–83 |
Cooked |
Variable; Met+Cys often limiting |
|
Buckwheat |
47–68 |
Cooked
groats |
Moderate
digestibility; complete-like profile |
|
Oats |
43–77 |
Dehulled/cooked |
Variable, up to good; better lysine among cereals |
|
Chia seeds |
40–60 |
Whole/raw
or soaked |
Lower;
digestibility limits, good lysine balance |
|
Hemp |
40–60 |
Seeds/protein |
Lower; lysine often limiting |
|
Rye |
47–56 |
Grain/dehulled
or flour |
Lower;
lysine-limited |
|
Barley |
47–59 |
Dehulled |
Lower; similar to rye, lysine-limited |
|
Rice |
37–64 |
Cooked |
Lower;
low lysine |
|
Corn/Maize |
36–54 |
Various |
Lower; low lysine/tryptophan |
|
Wheat |
40–48 |
Whole grain / flour |
Lower;
lysine severely limiting; pig-model consensus ~43–48 |
|
Sorghum |
29–54 |
Various |
Lower; poor digestibility, lysine-limited |
|
Millets (general, e.g., proso/foxtail/finger/pearl) |
7–55 |
Cooked/dehulled |
Mostly
lower; lysine severe in most varieties (e.g., proso/foxtail ~7–10) |
Summary
References
- Berrazaga, I., Micard, V., Gueugneau, M., & Boirie, Y. (2020). Plant proteins: Assessing their nutritional quality and effects on health and physical function. Nutrients, 12(12), Article 3704.
- Chalupa-Krebzdak, S., Long, C. J., & Miller, E. M. (2024). A review on nutritional quality of animal and plant-based milk alternatives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 23(4), Article e13395.
- Ciuris, C., Barrack, M., & Gray, A. (2019). A comparison of dietary protein digestibility, based on DIAAS scoring, in vegetarian and non-vegetarian athletes. Nutrients, 11(12), Article 3016.
- Day, L., & Zhao, X. (2023). Plant proteins: Methods of quality assessment and the human health impacts. Nutrients, 15(15), Article 3346.
- Fanelli, N. S., Kaczmarek, M., & Stein, H. H. (2021). Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) is greater in animal-based burgers than in plant-based burgers if determined in pigs. European Journal of Nutrition, 61(2), 1011–1022.
- Herreman, L., Nommensen, P., Pennings, B., & Hathcock, J. N. (2021). Limitations with the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with special attention to plant-based diets: A review. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 24(1), 1–7.
- Hodgkinson, S. M., Stroebinger, N., van der Wielen, N., Mensink, M., Hendriks, W. H., & Stein, H. H. (2021). True ileal amino acid digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAASs) of plant-based protein foods. Food Chemistry, 338, Article 127799.
- Kristensen, N. B., Madsen, M. L., & Vilsbøll, T. (2023). Protein content and amino acid composition in the diet of Danish vegans: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nutrition, 9, Article 128.
- Mathai, J. K., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H. (2017). Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS). British Journal of Nutrition, 117(4), 490–499.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.